Daniel De Jonge vs Julian Onken Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W W L L
Form
L L W L L L L W L LHead-To-Head: Jonge 1 - 0 Onken
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jonge winning 2 and Onken winning 0. The last match between Jonge and Onken was at the M15 Eupen, 06-08-2019, Q3, Clay with Daniel De Jonge getting the victory 6-2 7-6(7).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniel De Jonge | 1 |
| Julian Onken | 0 |
M15 Eupen(06-08-2019)
6
2
7
6
| Jonge | Stats | Onken |
|---|---|---|
| 71% (20-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | 892 |
| Highest Rank | 693 | |
| 25 | Age | 36 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 56% (120-93) | Career Total W/L | 58% (122-90) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kartal VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Blinkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-6(7) |
Stats 
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Julian Onken
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 2:7:0 | Average Match Time | 2:7:0 |
| 56% (48/86) | 1st Serve % | 71% (55/77) |
| 73% (35/48) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (30/55) |
| 45% (17/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (11/22) |
| 33% (4/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 18% (2/11) |
| 47% (36/77) | Return Points Win % | 40% (34/86) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daniel De Jonge Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Graca
Player
Daniel De Jonge
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
45%
(
34 of
75)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
77
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Axel Garcian
Player
Daniel De Jonge
47%
(
41 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
55 of
100)
10
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
6
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
100)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Tristan Berard
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Yoshka Sborowsky
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Loann Massard
Player
Daniel De Jonge
60%
(
75 of
126)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
126)
15
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
52 of
75)
55%
(
28 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
46 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
49 of
126)
129
Total Points Won
123
|
7-6(5) 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve %
50%
(
15 of
30)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
13 of
15)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
25
Total Points Won
25
|
4-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Ismael Soussi
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Evan Jarzaguet
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
3
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joshua Lapadat
Player
Daniel De Jonge
68%
(
73 of
107)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
37%
(
40 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Daniel Milavsky
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Julian Onken Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 4-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 5-2 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Julian Onken
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Leopold Zima
Player
Julian Onken
57%
(
60 of
106)
1st Serve %
67%
(
67 of
100)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
100)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louis Herman
Player
Julian Onken
42%
(
32 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (120/93) | Win/Loss | 58% (122/90) |
| 55% (256/213) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (269/205) |
| 52% (2304/2132) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (2263/1943) |
| 54% (29/25) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) |
| 53% (54/47) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (110/79) |
| 64% (37/21) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 529 | Aces Total | 140 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 |
| 782 | Total Double Faults | 104 |
| 1:6:59 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 342.69 | Average Opponent Rank | 349.46 |
| 55% (5063/9279) | 1st Serve % | 64% (3655/5669) |
| 70% (3524/5063) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (2245/3655) |
| 45% (1905/4216) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (956/2014) |
| 43% (421/984) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (300/663) |
| 41% (3891/9477) | Return Points Win % | 44% (2448/5618) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 50% (3/3) |
| 56% (120/93) | Futures W/L | 58% (119/87) |
| 56% (116/209) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (119/207) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 51% (21/41) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (23/47) |
| 54% (26/48) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (24/50) |
| 90% (117/105) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (119/104) |
| 10% (117/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (119/14) |
| 14% (95/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (93/17) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
